ANNOUNCEMENTS: A reminder about my planned
reading tour to promote my next collection, Fuck Them
All: A Chronicle of the Era of Darkness, Volume II next
spring. If you have at any time rashly offered lodging, liquor,
or less savory forms of hospitality to me and have not thought
better of it since, please reiterate those offers now so
that I can plan my route. And if you know of a good bookstore
in your vicinity that might be interested in hosting a slideshow
and reading, please recommend it.
I've finallly updated the letters pages
for the last three months. Sorry it took so long. These
little administrative chores are not my forte, and with
Ms. C.-H. gone they take about sixteen times longer.
Also I went back and revised a panel of "We're
Living in the Future." I've added more Martians,
which cannot help but improve anything.
Artist's Statement
Truly, we are in the summer doldrums of
the news. Look at the front pages these days: Sports scandals.
Bank failures. Obama in the Middle East. Nothing’s
happening. It’s enough to make you wish for an exciting
catastrophe. As a comedian I once heard said: “I
don’t give a shit about the budget. I don’t
care what country the fucking Pope is in. But you show
me a hospital on fire and people on crutches screaming
and jumping off the roof and I’m a happy guy!”
Panel 1: Professional propagandists in the
media are starting to use words like “inevitable” to
describe the military confrontation with Iran they’re
trying to provoke. Of course Iran isn’t helping matters
by firing off missiles and making with the supervillain
rhetoric about wiping Israel off the map. It’s like
watching a crazy drunk guy with a knife keep waving the
knife and sob incoherent threats as a cop, steadily leveling
a gun at him, tells him for the third and last time to
put down the weapon. Leaving aside the strategic inadvisability
and logistical implausibility of opening yet a third front
in the War on Terror, it just seems like not enough time
has passed since the last war to persuade people that another
one would be a good idea. As a rule, you usually have to
wait for an ignorant new generation to come along that
doesn’t remember the previous war before you can
get them whipped into a jingoistic frenzy over the new
one. I think what finally overcame our national “Vietnam
Syndrome”—the realization that invading countries
on the other side of the planet with no clear strategy
or objective was a bad idea after all, which passing spasm
of sanity was diagnosed by conservatives as a kind of post-traumatic
stress disorder or malaise of the national will—was
the accumulation of a critical mass of citizens who didn’t
know shit about Vietnam, so that when the administration
cranked up another Gulf of Tonkin hoax and said, Come
on, everybody, we gotta contain [terrorism] or there’ll
be, like, a domino effect, they said, The fuck
yeah!
I’m only forty-one, but I’ve
already seen two war propaganda campaigns, and I can already
tell you how they go: Specious proof of the enemy’s
ill intent will be waved before us and then whipped away
before anyone can get a good look at it. The spectre of
more calamitious attacks on U.S. soil is invoked. The kinds
of dudes who like to chant “U.S.A.!” will chant “U.S.A.!” The
rhetorical point will be made that freedom is not free.
Second-tier country stars will make some quick money with
bellicose ass-kicking anthems. Liberals and other such
peaceniks are branded cowards, America-haters, al Qaeda’s
fifth column. Unrealistic ultimatums will be offered, and
will, unsurprisingly, pass unmet. The motions will be gone
through in congress and at the U.N. Then a lot of people
will get killed, no one will like us, and it’ll be
a big fiasco, like it always is, every time, and a few
years later the dudes who used to chant “U.S.A.!” will
be angrily demanding to know what the fuck happened and
blaming liberals for their defeat. Wait ten years. Repeat.
Liberals are as easily
conditioned as conservatives (well, okay, not quite, but
they’re no less prone to knee-jerk reaction), and
it’s quite possible that our by-now-well-justified
mistrust of the Bush administration will keep us skeptical
and unsupportive from of a military action that might actually
be advisable for once. Maybe Iran is building nuclear weapons
and the first thing they intend to do with them is nuke
Jerusalem. Who knows? Not me, but also not our intelligence
agencies. It’s not like I actually knew for certain
that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction
back in '03. All I knew was that the Bush administration
didn’t know, as they claimed to, that he did. Bill
Mauldin, no fan of war, said that “[Pacifists] are
right ninety percent of the time. It’s that other
ten percent that worries me.”
CORRECTION: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's
notorious phrase quoted above, about the state of Israel
being "wiped off the map," is apparently a mistranslation.
The sense of the original Arabic is closer to "vanish
from the page of time," and refers specifically to
the present Israeli regime. I regreet having repearted
the misinformation. Ahmadinejad is still a dangerous fruitcake,
of course, but probably no more so than George Bush. Please
bear in mind that my interest in Middle Eastern politics
is minimal and that when the whole issue of Israel vs.
the Arabic world comes up I am prone to rolling my eyes
and making the "yap-yap-yap" motion behind people's
backs.
That’s a nostalgic portrait of me
and my colleague Megan, who was my comrade-at-arms in the
war-protest days of 2002 and '03. Hi, Megan.
Panel 2: Having already drawn “Reasons
to Look Forward to the Next Terrorist Attack” I was
at something of a loss to know how to make the second panel
funny or at interesting until I thought of a sort of parody
of the flag-raising on Iwo Jima, with the incumbent and
two candidates playing King of the Hill atop a heap of
burning rubble. (Please note my superb pile of rubble.)
If there is another terrorist attack in the months leading
up to the election, the political posturing will be insufferable.
Impossible to say at this point what the fallout (ha, ha!)
from another attack would be in the election. It seems
obscene even to consider such a thing, though no doubt
there have been late-night conversations at high levels
in both campaigns on this subject. Historically, people
have flocked back to the big abusive daddy party to protect
them when they're frightened, but since the Bush administration
has proven itself incapable of managing an occupation,
evacuating U.S. citizens from a disaster area, or even
rebuilding a couple of skyscrapers, maybe the myth of the
Republican party as at least hardheaded and competent,
even if they are if brutal and callous, has finally died.
But I am perhaps overestimating the intelligence of the
American voter. More likely if there's another terrorist
attack Barack Obama's middle name will become a terminal
liability and we'll elect an old man whose solution to
the problem of al Qaeda is to win the Vietman War once
and
for all.
Panel 3: See Matt
Taibbi’s sobering essay on the imminent collapse
of the economy, which political leaders and media are
either oblivious to or politely trying to ignore. (In
fact please just read everything Taibbi writes so I don’t
have to tiresomely remind you every month.) According
to my doomsaying friend Rob, we may expect things to
get worse before they get better, except without getting
better. He outlines the near future thusly: "the
US banking and financial system collapses... followed
by runs on ordinary savings accounts, then followed in
turn very soon by gasoline and diesel shortages, followed
shortly thereafter by food shortages." I myself
am unconcerned about any of these things because we know
that one economic reality will remain constant despite
whatever upheavals and calamities may come: the world
needs laughter. So I'm all set.
I have no idea why Boyd, dressed as a cartoon
Depression-era hobo, is speaking like a cockney here. His
line just popped nonsensically into my head, and regarding
such matters I tend to go with my instincts. The little
Buster Brown pooch also seemed somehow obligatory.
PANEL 4: Yes this panel is about the imagined
assassination of Obama. There’s a sort of taboo against
talking or even thinking about this, a sort of knock-on-wood
superstition against somehow magically invoking it, but
I suspect that most editorial cartoonists have secretly
thought about what they might draw if it happens. (I have
no doubt that some of those family-daily hacks are thinking
of it as a big, once-in-a-career Pulitzer opportunity.)
I know that my own first instinct will be to write America
off as an unreconstructed nation of racist killers. But
I’ve promised myself that I’m not going to
yield to that impulse in print. If the unspeakable does
happen, the last thing we’ll need is anyone like
me making us feel any worse. So I’m trying to exorcise
my bleakly cynical cartoon here. (Yes that is a lynching
victim strung up from the arm of Liberty. You may click here for
an enlarged detail, if that’s your idea of a good
time.) But what I might actually draw that could be at
all uplifting or redemptive in the face of such ghastly
disillusionment I cannot yet imagine.
Note: Don't forget our donation button,
directly below. An original cartoon by B. Kliban has come
up for sale. I aim to have it.
|